I am doing an experiment involving my pendulum and three cards; a black joker, an ace of hearts and a king of clubs. I shuffle them and place them on the desk. I use the pendulum to "guess" where is the card that I am looking for. In all 20 runs I changed the target 3 times, so I am not looking always for the same card.
#1 Definite 2. Correct.
#2 2 and 3. Correct is two.
#3 Weak 1. Correct.
#4 Weak 2. Correct.
#5 Weak 1 and 2. Correct is 2.
(I set the cards more apart now) #6 Definite 2. Correct.
#7 Weak 3. Wrong. Correct is 1.
#8 Weak 1. Wrong. Correct is 2.
#9 1. Wrong. Correct is 3.
#10 1 and 3. Correct is 3.
(Switch to pendulum over left open palm) #11 Definite 3. Correct.
Interesting could you establish what sort of mindset or meditation your are in while experimenting? Just to see if there are any triggers that give a more favourable result?
__________________
Omega(the end) + X(the unknown) = Ending Ignorance of the unknown. Truth...knowledge...enlightenment
There is no failure only feedback. Failure is when you stop trying.
Well, one thing is that you must really have that question in mind. The questions can also be formed into statements, which is how I managed to not get any more inconclusives. Instead of asking "Is card number two the Joker?" I say "Card number two is the Joker." Not aloud, I just think of the question. The answers have gotten clearer, even though they stay of same accuracy. I asked the source if "it" can give me accurate answers, it replied YES. That by itself is a paradox:
The source answers me that it can give accurate results. However, it does not. Does that mean the above answer is not reliable, or is there some other thing to it? I think my conscious/lower self (or even unconscious?) is intermingling with the "transmission", which is why the answers are not correct sometimes. I want to get to the bottom of this thing, with different approaches. The first is this experiment, with one hundred answers. My hope is that I can reason my way through to this source of infinite knowledge. If my theory is correct, I could reach the same source of Edgar Cayce. It is definitely there, it did not go away with the deceased mystic. About PK, it told me that everyone is born with a mental block which is preventing you to do PK. It told me that you Shirak Rytyhaleevi from Australia have overcome this block and are truly able to do legit PK. Also I found out that the collective unconsciousness is not God. And, that only God can remove this block from me. It was not to be answered by conventional prayers, seems you have to be specific. So, I guess if one is worthy it will be granted upon him.
So far the answers seem to be 50% correct, so maybe half of the stuff I wrote could be true... But it would be unwise to conclude such things at this point...
-- Edited by Cavalorn at 22:48, 2008-03-24
-- Edited by Cavalorn at 22:50, 2008-03-24
__________________
Oh, in case I used the word God: actually I have no idea what that is.
Nisha Lee, yes it could be applied to that, but it would take like half an hour to specify the location. :) Are they in the living room? NO Are they in the kitchen? YES Are they on the floor? NO Are they in the cookie jar? NO . . . Are they in the trash? YES
@ Ryan, no problem man, glad you joined us once again. Congrats on your new job and good luck with it ;)
__________________
Oh, in case I used the word God: actually I have no idea what that is.
Would you say that one certain days it was easier or that you got better results? Have you found that different types of questions get more accurate results?
__________________
Omega(the end) + X(the unknown) = Ending Ignorance of the unknown. Truth...knowledge...enlightenment
There is no failure only feedback. Failure is when you stop trying.
I had work to do for the faculty so I postponed writing the conclusion.
THE CONCLUSION To immediately answer Shirak's questions. Yes, the performance is definitely conditioned by some number of variables, of which the most important could be tranquillity of mind. Time of the day however does not seem to play any role, as far as 100 answers can tell. The pendulum is highly suggestive. I found out if I visualized too much it actually made it all worse. So, to your second question, yes, it does matter how you ask the question. At session three I realised it is better to make statements, then wait for the confirmation to happen. So instead of asking "Is card on the number 3 the Ace?" I say "The card on the number 3 is the Ace." and wait for the response. This way it is faster to get a clear response. But, as you may have noticed, my first session was the best, with only 35% wrong, which could be because of the casuality of the approach. I would call this result "moderate success", even if there is just a slight difference from what I could have guessed by chance. I still feel somewhat successful because I definitely learned something. ATM I am planning what will be the next step with this, so stay tuned :)
-- Edited by Cavalorn at 08:19, 2008-03-31
-- Edited by Cavalorn at 08:20, 2008-03-31
__________________
Oh, in case I used the word God: actually I have no idea what that is.
